Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
An order granting valuation and the first opportunity to purchase shares was treated as self-operative: once the fair value reports were available, the appellant had to accept the valuation and indicate willingness to buy, without any further formal offer. By rejecting the higher valuation and seeking averaging of the reports, the appellant failed to exercise the first option, so the respondents' right to purchase the shares at the accepted fair value crystallised. The Tribunal also held that a later challenge to the valuation and a belated offer to buy could not revive a waived right after the arrangement had been acted upon. The appeal was dismissed and the sale in favour of the respondents was sustained.
An order granting valuation and the first opportunity to purchase shares was treated as self-operative: once the fair value reports were available, the appellant had to accept the valuation and indicate willingness to buy, without any further formal offer. By rejecting the higher valuation and seeking averaging of the reports, the appellant failed to exercise the first option, so the respondents' right to purchase the shares at the accepted fair value crystallised. The Tribunal also held that a later challenge to the valuation and a belated offer to buy could not revive a waived right after the arrangement had been acted upon. The appeal was dismissed and the sale in favour of the respondents was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
