Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Entitlement to input tax credit was reconsidered in light of subsequent statutory insertions of Sections 16(5) and 16(6); because the impugned order denied credit solely on the ground of belated availment under Section 16(4), the HC remitted the matter for fresh adjudication so the respondent must re-examine entitlement on merits leaving aside the belated-availment ground and decide after hearing the petitioner. The court granted conditional interim relief by directing the petitioner to pay amounts due for belated returns and file a reply within 30 days; on compliance and absence of other arrears the bank attachment will be lifted pending final adjudication.
Entitlement to input tax credit was reconsidered in light of subsequent statutory insertions of Sections 16(5) and 16(6); because the impugned order denied credit solely on the ground of belated availment under Section 16(4), the HC remitted the matter for fresh adjudication so the respondent must re-examine entitlement on merits leaving aside the belated-availment ground and decide after hearing the petitioner. The court granted conditional interim relief by directing the petitioner to pay amounts due for belated returns and file a reply within 30 days; on compliance and absence of other arrears the bank attachment will be lifted pending final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
