Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Vagueness in a show-cause notice and failure to disclose material particulars violated natural justice: cancellation of GST registration must rest on objective satisfaction of jurisdictional facts and independent quasi-judicial reasoning, not on investigative dictation. A non-speaking order repeating investigative allegations without identifying tax periods, invoices, suppliers or quantification is invalid. Consequently the impugned notices and cancellation orders were set aside and the petitioner's registration restored; the authority may, if advised, issue a fresh detailed show-cause notice specifying precise allegations, periods, invoices, suppliers and quantification and afford a reasonable hearing.
Vagueness in a show-cause notice and failure to disclose material particulars violated natural justice: cancellation of GST registration must rest on objective satisfaction of jurisdictional facts and independent quasi-judicial reasoning, not on investigative dictation. A non-speaking order repeating investigative allegations without identifying tax periods, invoices, suppliers or quantification is invalid. Consequently the impugned notices and cancellation orders were set aside and the petitioner's registration restored; the authority may, if advised, issue a fresh detailed show-cause notice specifying precise allegations, periods, invoices, suppliers and quantification and afford a reasonable hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.