Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Blocking of input tax credit was contested on grounds of reversal of inadmissible credit with interest and penalty; the decision records that the authority applied its mind when passing the order because the petitioner produced invoices and e-way bill but failed to furnish additional evidence proving actual movement of goods, and thus the challenge lacks merits. The petitioner is granted liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Commissioner within thirty days and to adduce supporting documents and arguments before that forum.
Blocking of input tax credit was contested on grounds of reversal of inadmissible credit with interest and penalty; the decision records that the authority applied its mind when passing the order because the petitioner produced invoices and e-way bill but failed to furnish additional evidence proving actual movement of goods, and thus the challenge lacks merits. The petitioner is granted liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Commissioner within thirty days and to adduce supporting documents and arguments before that forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
