Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Whether seized documents constituted "incriminating material" to sustain an addition under section 68: Tribunal found the assessee's books and financials consistently showed investment/trading in shares, no evidence of physical movement of goods, and no AO finding that seized Tally data were parallel books; search material related to other group entities and thus irrelevant to the assessee's transactions. Legal basis: absence of incriminating material and reliance on Supreme Court precedent. Outcome: addition treating loans as bogus under section 68 is unsupported and is deleted; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Whether seized documents constituted "incriminating material" to sustain an addition under section 68: Tribunal found the assessee's books and financials consistently showed investment/trading in shares, no evidence of physical movement of goods, and no AO finding that seized Tally data were parallel books; search material related to other group entities and thus irrelevant to the assessee's transactions. Legal basis: absence of incriminating material and reliance on Supreme Court precedent. Outcome: addition treating loans as bogus under section 68 is unsupported and is deleted; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.