Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether customs duty on conversion from foreign to coastal run is leviable when import occurred before Notification No.12/2012: court held liability arises at the time of first import (date of import controls), and because the relevant imports predated the Notification, no duty was attractable - demand quashed. Whether the impugned letter constituted a valid demand or merely a show-cause notice: court found the enclosed computation and 14-day remittance call rendered it a substantive demand, not a procedural notice, and therefore the communication was invalid - quashed. - HC
Whether customs duty on conversion from foreign to coastal run is leviable when import occurred before Notification No.12/2012: court held liability arises at the time of first import (date of import controls), and because the relevant imports predated the Notification, no duty was attractable - demand quashed. Whether the impugned letter constituted a valid demand or merely a show-cause notice: court found the enclosed computation and 14-day remittance call rendered it a substantive demand, not a procedural notice, and therefore the communication was invalid - quashed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.