Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue was whether GST exemption under Notification No. 16/2025-Central Tax (Rate) applied to a group health insurance policy covering a large body of members. The court held that IRDAI (Health Insurance) Regulations, 2016 prohibit forming a group solely to obtain insurance and require an identifiable relationship between members and the group policyholder; issuance of the policy by a regulated insurer and the tendering/collective bargaining process established such relationship and a common welfare purpose. Accordingly, the notification was construed as exempting only individual health insurance policies, not group policies negotiated through collective arrangements, and the writ petitions were dismissed. - HC
Issue was whether GST exemption under Notification No. 16/2025-Central Tax (Rate) applied to a group health insurance policy covering a large body of members. The court held that IRDAI (Health Insurance) Regulations, 2016 prohibit forming a group solely to obtain insurance and require an identifiable relationship between members and the group policyholder; issuance of the policy by a regulated insurer and the tendering/collective bargaining process established such relationship and a common welfare purpose. Accordingly, the notification was construed as exempting only individual health insurance policies, not group policies negotiated through collective arrangements, and the writ petitions were dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.