PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 was examined regarding additions for allegedly unexplained purchases/sales and allied issues. Where the seller's sales had already been accepted/settled in first appeal, the same transactions could not be treated as unexplained in the purchaser's hands, and the revisional direction could not nullify the CIT(A)'s finding; section 263 jurisdiction was held improperly exercised to that extent. However, for purchases from another supplier whose sales were not shown to have been accepted and where the AO had made a bogus sales addition after PMGKY surrender, the AO's enquiry was held incomplete, justifying set-aside for de novo consideration. The unexplained difference between audited P&L profit and computed income also warranted de novo examination, and audit-objection-based initiation was upheld. Appeal partly allowed. - ITAT
Revision under section 263 was examined regarding additions for allegedly unexplained purchases/sales and allied issues. Where the seller's sales had already been accepted/settled in first appeal, the same transactions could not be treated as unexplained in the purchaser's hands, and the revisional direction could not nullify the CIT(A)'s finding; section 263 jurisdiction was held improperly exercised to that extent. However, for purchases from another supplier whose sales were not shown to have been accepted and where the AO had made a bogus sales addition after PMGKY surrender, the AO's enquiry was held incomplete, justifying set-aside for de novo consideration. The unexplained difference between audited P&L profit and computed income also warranted de novo examination, and audit-objection-based initiation was upheld. Appeal partly allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
