Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
The HC dismissed the application seeking condonation of 116 days' delay in filing an appeal under S.42 PMLA. It held that, read with S.29(2) Limitation Act, the statutory scheme under S.42 PMLA prescribes a maximum outer limit of 120 days (60 days plus a further 60 days) for filing an appeal, expressly excluding the application of S.5 Limitation Act beyond this period. Relying on analogous SC precedents under the Electricity Act and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the HC concluded it lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days, rendering the appeal time-barred.
The HC dismissed the application seeking condonation of 116 days' delay in filing an appeal under S.42 PMLA. It held that, read with S.29(2) Limitation Act, the statutory scheme under S.42 PMLA prescribes a maximum outer limit of 120 days (60 days plus a further 60 days) for filing an appeal, expressly excluding the application of S.5 Limitation Act beyond this period. Relying on analogous SC precedents under the Electricity Act and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the HC concluded it lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days, rendering the appeal time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
