PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the PCIT's invocation of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, holding that the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w s.144B was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The AO had failed to examine whether income from sale of securities held for not more than 12 months, claimed as short-term capital gains taxable u/s 111A, could alternatively be assessed as business income, despite the assessee being formed for investment activity. The AO's enquiries were confined only to exemption aspects of short-term capital gains of Rs. 8.16 crore. Relying on CBDT Circular No. 6/2016, ITAT held there was no bar on examining characterization of gains on securities held for less than 12 months. The PCIT's direction to re-examine this limited issue was sustained and the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT upheld the PCIT's invocation of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, holding that the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w s.144B was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The AO had failed to examine whether income from sale of securities held for not more than 12 months, claimed as short-term capital gains taxable u/s 111A, could alternatively be assessed as business income, despite the assessee being formed for investment activity. The AO's enquiries were confined only to exemption aspects of short-term capital gains of Rs. 8.16 crore. Relying on CBDT Circular No. 6/2016, ITAT held there was no bar on examining characterization of gains on securities held for less than 12 months. The PCIT's direction to re-examine this limited issue was sustained and the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.