TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT held that demands relating to services rendered to two government entities, raised by invoking the extended period under the proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, were time-barred, as the dispute concerned interpretation of exemption entries 12, 12A, 13 and 14 of N/N. 25/2012-ST and did not involve suppression or fraud. Consequently, those demands were confined to the normal limitation period and set aside as barred. Regarding short payment for 2015-16 admitted in ST-3 returns, the matter was remanded to the original authority to reconcile challans for 2017-18 with returns; recovery, interest, and Section 78 penalty would survive only to the extent of unreconciled short payment, while penalties under Section 77(1)(b) and 77(1)(c) were quashed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
