PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the Pr.CIT's revision u/s 263 and consequential addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credits were unsustainable. The assessee had furnished complete evidences establishing identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of share subscribers, including responses to notices u/s 133(6) and compliance with summons u/s 131, with payments made through banking channels. Mere non-traceability of some subscribers at later dates could not justify addition u/s 68 in absence of contrary material. ITAT further held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147/148 were barred by limitation, as the original assessment u/s 143(3) had examined and accepted the disclosed transactions and losses, leaving no failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The reassessment was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
ITAT held that the Pr.CIT's revision u/s 263 and consequential addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credits were unsustainable. The assessee had furnished complete evidences establishing identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of share subscribers, including responses to notices u/s 133(6) and compliance with summons u/s 131, with payments made through banking channels. Mere non-traceability of some subscribers at later dates could not justify addition u/s 68 in absence of contrary material. ITAT further held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147/148 were barred by limitation, as the original assessment u/s 143(3) had examined and accepted the disclosed transactions and losses, leaving no failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The reassessment was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.