PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the addition made by the AO under s. 56(2)(viib) in respect of share premium received from its holding company was unsustainable. ITAT noted that the deeming fiction under s. 56(2)(viib) does not apply where shares are issued to a holding company and, therefore, the AO lacked jurisdiction to invoke this provision. ITAT further held that once the assessee furnished a valuation report in accordance with Rule 11UA, the AO had no authority to modify or disregard the prescribed valuation methodology, particularly by incorrectly adopting the value of agricultural land from the balance sheet. Consequently, the share valuation adopted by the assessee was upheld and the AO was directed to delete the entire addition on account of share premium, resulting in full relief to the assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the addition made by the AO under s. 56(2)(viib) in respect of share premium received from its holding company was unsustainable. ITAT noted that the deeming fiction under s. 56(2)(viib) does not apply where shares are issued to a holding company and, therefore, the AO lacked jurisdiction to invoke this provision. ITAT further held that once the assessee furnished a valuation report in accordance with Rule 11UA, the AO had no authority to modify or disregard the prescribed valuation methodology, particularly by incorrectly adopting the value of agricultural land from the balance sheet. Consequently, the share valuation adopted by the assessee was upheld and the AO was directed to delete the entire addition on account of share premium, resulting in full relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.