Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A), holding that expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business activities as a sole proprietor and as a working partner in two firms. The Tribunal found the AO's proportionate disallowance rested on an erroneous factual premise that the assessee was a working partner in only one firm; Revenue adduced no material to rebut the business nexus of the expenditures. Consequently the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the disallowance was set aside and the impugned additions deleted.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A), holding that expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business activities as a sole proprietor and as a working partner in two firms. The Tribunal found the AO's proportionate disallowance rested on an erroneous factual premise that the assessee was a working partner in only one firm; Revenue adduced no material to rebut the business nexus of the expenditures. Consequently the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the disallowance was set aside and the impugned additions deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
