Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC granted ad-interim relief to the petitioners, finding a strong prima facie case based on gross delay in adjudication of a show-cause notice issued in July 2013 and finally adjudicated in September 2025. The court noted protracted procedural delay, limited earlier hearings, and that delay materially affected the impugned order. It also held that the monetary penalty levied personally on each director was prima facie disproportionate to the contravention concerning delayed reporting of foreign inward remittances and late filing of Form FC-GPR under the FEMA framework. Consequently, the HC directed ad-interim protection to the petitioners, restraining enforcement of the impugned order pending further adjudication.
The HC granted ad-interim relief to the petitioners, finding a strong prima facie case based on gross delay in adjudication of a show-cause notice issued in July 2013 and finally adjudicated in September 2025. The court noted protracted procedural delay, limited earlier hearings, and that delay materially affected the impugned order. It also held that the monetary penalty levied personally on each director was prima facie disproportionate to the contravention concerning delayed reporting of foreign inward remittances and late filing of Form FC-GPR under the FEMA framework. Consequently, the HC directed ad-interim protection to the petitioners, restraining enforcement of the impugned order pending further adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
