Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the petition by way of remand. The court held that the petitioner had specifically denied any discrepancy between Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A and that the adjudicating authority failed to address that contention and breached the audi alteram partem principle by not affording an effective hearing. The matter is remitted to Respondent No.3 for de novo adjudication on merits, including consideration of the petitioner's contention regarding no difference in demand arising from reversal of input tax credit or increase in output tax liability, after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the petition by way of remand. The court held that the petitioner had specifically denied any discrepancy between Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A and that the adjudicating authority failed to address that contention and breached the audi alteram partem principle by not affording an effective hearing. The matter is remitted to Respondent No.3 for de novo adjudication on merits, including consideration of the petitioner's contention regarding no difference in demand arising from reversal of input tax credit or increase in output tax liability, after providing the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
