Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie...
The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continue
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie evidence indicates misuse of the complainant's GST credentials to effect fraudulent transactions totalling Rs. 1,09,11,404 via multiple proprietorships, and that multiple persons appear implicated, necessitating further investigation. The court found the arrest and transit remand procedures to have been lawfully completed, rejecting contention of procedural illegality. The HC further held that because the offence is cognizable and preliminary enquiry would only serve limited purpose of ascertaining cognizability, the accused is not entitled to bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed and disposed of.
The HC refused bail to the accused, holding that prima facie evidence indicates misuse of the complainant's GST credentials to effect fraudulent transactions totalling Rs. 1,09,11,404 via multiple proprietorships, and that multiple persons appear implicated, necessitating further investigation. The court found the arrest and transit remand procedures to have been lawfully completed, rejecting contention of procedural illegality. The HC further held that because the offence is cognizable and preliminary enquiry would only serve limited purpose of ascertaining cognizability, the accused is not entitled to bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
