Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the addition under section 69A. The Tribunal held that entries in a diary seized from the company's premises, without recovery of cash or evidence of possession or ownership by the assessee, cannot sustain an addition as unaccounted income; mere notings in a third party's diary constituted insufficient evidentiary basis. One cheque item matched the books, but other alleged receipts were neither reflected in the assessee's nor the company's accounts and were recorded at the company's place; consequently, if any liability arises it pertains to the company, not the assessee, and section 69A could not be invoked against the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
