Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that the TPO's order under s.92CA(3) is time-barred by one day and therefore invalid. The tribunal found the assessment limitation under s.153(1) expired on 31 Mar 2013, so the statutory 60-day cutoff for issuing an order under s.92CA(3A) lapsed on 29 Jan 2013; reliance on a departmental circular using the phrase "two months" could not supplant the statutory "60 days" calculation. Applying the statutory timeline strictly, the TPO's s.92CA order was barred by limitation and set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that the TPO's order under s.92CA(3) is time-barred by one day and therefore invalid. The tribunal found the assessment limitation under s.153(1) expired on 31 Mar 2013, so the statutory 60-day cutoff for issuing an order under s.92CA(3A) lapsed on 29 Jan 2013; reliance on a departmental circular using the phrase "two months" could not supplant the statutory "60 days" calculation. Applying the statutory timeline strictly, the TPO's s.92CA order was barred by limitation and set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
