Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT held that no export duty is leviable on the 14,000 MT claimed by the appellant SEZ unit, as SEZ law governs and SEZ authorities may, if warranted, proceed under SEZ Act/Rules; consequently the Department's export-duty demand quashed. The import-duty demand was unsustainable for lack of intentional evasion, but confiscation/redemption fine liability stood in part: a redemption fine reduced to Rs.1,500,000 (already realized) was upheld; no duty is payable on 1,026.7 MT. Confiscation of 7,000 MT and of vehicles was held untenable. Penal demands under s.114A were rejected; penalties under ss.72/73A(3) for procedural breaches were sustained but reduced to Rs.250,000 each. Impugned Commissioner's order modified; appeal allowed in part.
CESTAT held that no export duty is leviable on the 14,000 MT claimed by the appellant SEZ unit, as SEZ law governs and SEZ authorities may, if warranted, proceed under SEZ Act/Rules; consequently the Department's export-duty demand quashed. The import-duty demand was unsustainable for lack of intentional evasion, but confiscation/redemption fine liability stood in part: a redemption fine reduced to Rs.1,500,000 (already realized) was upheld; no duty is payable on 1,026.7 MT. Confiscation of 7,000 MT and of vehicles was held untenable. Penal demands under s.114A were rejected; penalties under ss.72/73A(3) for procedural breaches were sustained but reduced to Rs.250,000 each. Impugned Commissioner's order modified; appeal allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
