Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the re-imposition of previously dropped demands relating to sub-contracting services and mobilisation advances, holding that those demands had been abandoned in earlier orders and were not before the appellate tribunal on remand; consequently they could not be resurrected without fresh adjudication or express direction. The court found a prima facie entitlement for the Petitioner to challenge only the matters remitted to the CESTAT and therefore permitted the Petitioner to pursue its appellate remedy before CESTAT subject to the conditions imposed by the HC. The petition is disposed, with adjudication on liability to be determined by CESTAT in accordance with the court's observations.
The HC set aside the re-imposition of previously dropped demands relating to sub-contracting services and mobilisation advances, holding that those demands had been abandoned in earlier orders and were not before the appellate tribunal on remand; consequently they could not be resurrected without fresh adjudication or express direction. The court found a prima facie entitlement for the Petitioner to challenge only the matters remitted to the CESTAT and therefore permitted the Petitioner to pursue its appellate remedy before CESTAT subject to the conditions imposed by the HC. The petition is disposed, with adjudication on liability to be determined by CESTAT in accordance with the court's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
