Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal by the appellant seeking refund of excess duty paid on clearance, holding the refund claim not maintainable where no appeal challenged the appellant's self-assessment and the appellant failed to rebut unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found documentary proof inadequate to show that central excise burden was not passed on to buyers; disclosed MRPs indicated duties and taxes were included in sale prices and the statutory presumption under sections 12A and 12 that incidence of duty was shifted to purchasers applies. Chartered Accountant certification and authorities relied upon were held distinguishable and insufficient. The appeal therefore lacks merit and is dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal by the appellant seeking refund of excess duty paid on clearance, holding the refund claim not maintainable where no appeal challenged the appellant's self-assessment and the appellant failed to rebut unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found documentary proof inadequate to show that central excise burden was not passed on to buyers; disclosed MRPs indicated duties and taxes were included in sale prices and the statutory presumption under sections 12A and 12 that incidence of duty was shifted to purchasers applies. Chartered Accountant certification and authorities relied upon were held distinguishable and insufficient. The appeal therefore lacks merit and is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
