Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court and the revisional court, and restored the criminal proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the learned Magistrate. The Court held that SICA Section 22 does not per se bar prosecution under Section 138; where a Section 22A restraint operates, its effect is factual and depends on whether the restraint prevents disbursements for day-to-day operations. On the facts, the restraint did not preclude issuance of the cheques to discharge liabilities for supplies, and the revisional court erred in recalling processes; factual issues, including rebuttal of statutory presumptions as to cheque issuance, remain for trial.
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court and the revisional court, and restored the criminal proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the learned Magistrate. The Court held that SICA Section 22 does not per se bar prosecution under Section 138; where a Section 22A restraint operates, its effect is factual and depends on whether the restraint prevents disbursements for day-to-day operations. On the facts, the restraint did not preclude issuance of the cheques to discharge liabilities for supplies, and the revisional court erred in recalling processes; factual issues, including rebuttal of statutory presumptions as to cheque issuance, remain for trial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
