Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in I...
Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscr...
Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended...
The AAR held that the Applicant is not entitled to input tax credit for GST paid on fire-fighting systems and public-health equipment installed as part of a new factory. The installations were characterized as permanently affixed to immovable property and thus not "plant and machinery," bringing the supply within the embargoes of s.17(5)(c) and, alternatively, s.17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017; GST attributable to the composite works contract is therefore non-creditable. Because ITC denial on the specific contract is dispositive, the AAR declined to adjudicate the ancillary question on the timing for availing ITC against supplier "advance component" invoices.
The AAR held that the Applicant is not entitled to input tax credit for GST paid on fire-fighting systems and public-health equipment installed as part of a new factory. The installations were characterized as permanently affixed to immovable property and thus not "plant and machinery," bringing the supply within the embargoes of s.17(5)(c) and, alternatively, s.17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017; GST attributable to the composite works contract is therefore non-creditable. Because ITC denial on the specific contract is dispositive, the AAR declined to adjudicate the ancillary question on the timing for availing ITC against supplier "advance component" invoices.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
