Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the TPO order under section 92CA(3) and the assessment order under section 143(3) insofar as they invoked section 92BA(i) are invalid and void ab initio because section 92BA(i) was omitted with effect from 01.04.2017; accordingly the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the upward transfer-pricing adjustment equal to 10% of the aggregate value of specified domestic transactions. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit; the impugned additions made by reference to the now-omitted statutory provision cannot stand against the Assessee in the absence of any saving provision.
ITAT held that the TPO order under section 92CA(3) and the assessment order under section 143(3) insofar as they invoked section 92BA(i) are invalid and void ab initio because section 92BA(i) was omitted with effect from 01.04.2017; accordingly the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the upward transfer-pricing adjustment equal to 10% of the aggregate value of specified domestic transactions. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit; the impugned additions made by reference to the now-omitted statutory provision cannot stand against the Assessee in the absence of any saving provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.