Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for smuggling 11,233.370 grams of foreign-origin gold. The tribunal rejected the appellant's claim of denial of opportunity for cross-examination and voluntariness of his statement under Section 108, deeming these contentions as afterthoughts unsupported by prior complaints. The recovery of smuggled gold from the appellant's possession was undisputed, with no claimant asserting ownership. The appellant's knowledge of the illicit nature of the consignment was established through his own statement and corroborative evidence. Considering the appellant's habitual involvement in smuggling and the substantial value of the confiscated gold exceeding Rs 3 crore, the penalty of Rs 10,00,000/- was affirmed as appropriate and not excessive. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.