Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the revision under section 263, which contended that the AO erred in not invoking section 68 read with section 115BBE on unexplained creditors and liabilities. The HC had found that the PCIT did not dispute the assessee's factual assertion that the amounts represented opening balances and genuine trade creditors, supported by adequate evidence proving source and genuineness. The SC upheld that the assessee discharged the burden of proof under section 68, and no error was found in the AO's order. Consequently, no interference was warranted, and the petition was dismissed. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
