Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT upheld the disallowance of the loss claimed by the appellant on cancellation of a forward contract with Citi Bank NA, entered to hedge foreign exchange fluctuations on funds advanced to its foreign subsidiary. The tribunal affirmed that the loss was capital in nature, as the underlying transaction aimed at acquiring a capital asset, namely Dunlop Tyres International Pvt. Ltd. The expenditure was directly connected to acquiring a source of income and creating a long-term business advantage. Established principles confirm that expenses incurred for acquisition or creation of capital assets retain their capital character regardless of any subsequent profit enhancement. Consequently, the loss could not be allowed as a deduction under business income. The appellant's appeal was dismissed, maintaining the assessment's treatment of the loss as capital expenditure and rejecting its claim for revenue deduction.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
