Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Board found the Noticee guilty of violating regulation 13(b) read with 13(a) of the IA Regulations and clauses 1, 5, and 8 of the Code of Conduct under the Third Schedule by failing to update material information and conducting unregistered investment advisory activities through two partnership firms. Although the Designated Authority (DA) viewed the non-updation as a technical violation and recommended no cancellation, the Board disagreed, noting the Noticee's engagement in advisory services prior to registration and prolonged unregistered activities over two years as aggravating factors. The Board rejected the Noticee's police complaint defense and the DA's recommendation against suspension. Considering the gravity of the violations and despite mitigating factors like cessation of activities and fee refunds, the Board imposed a six-month suspension of the Noticee's registration as an Investment Adviser, deeming it proportionate and necessary to uphold regulatory compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
