Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that payments made to a full-time director constitute salary and are not subject to service tax under Management Consultancy Service. The appellant failed to produce documentary evidence such as salary slips or Form-16 to conclusively prove the nature of payment; however, reliance was placed on established precedent that remuneration to whole-time directors is exempt from service tax due to the employer-employee relationship. The appellant had paid the disputed tax and interest promptly after issuance of the show cause notice, and the tribunal accepted the advocate's assertion that the payments were part of the director's salary. Consequently, the demand of service tax on these payments was set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
