Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT held that Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd., having an unregistered Agreement to Sell, is not entitled to protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, as per Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1908. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's direction for Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. to vacate the premises was upheld. The claim of Rs. 2.51 crores filed by Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. was wrongly rejected by the Liquidator solely on the ground of delay; thus, the appeal challenging this rejection was partly allowed, directing the Liquidator to admit and treat the claim according to the IBC distribution framework. However, the Adjudicating Authority's order directing payment of Rs. 2.01 crores to Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. outside the statutory distribution mechanism was set aside, with a mandate for the Liquidator to refund the amount with any interest within 30 days. The appeal was dismissed in all other respects.
The NCLAT held that Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd., having an unregistered Agreement to Sell, is not entitled to protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, as per Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1908. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's direction for Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. to vacate the premises was upheld. The claim of Rs. 2.51 crores filed by Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. was wrongly rejected by the Liquidator solely on the ground of delay; thus, the appeal challenging this rejection was partly allowed, directing the Liquidator to admit and treat the claim according to the IBC distribution framework. However, the Adjudicating Authority's order directing payment of Rs. 2.01 crores to Atul Paper Pvt. Ltd. outside the statutory distribution mechanism was set aside, with a mandate for the Liquidator to refund the amount with any interest within 30 days. The appeal was dismissed in all other respects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
