Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The HC held that the tax demand exceeding the taxable turnover arose from a mere arithmetical miscalculation. The petitioner was permitted to invoke the second proviso to Section 161 of the Act, 2017, allowing correction of the error despite the usual limitation period under the first proviso. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an application under this provision, which the Assessing Officer must consider and dispose of on merits. The petition was allowed in part, enabling rectification of the tax demand through the prescribed statutory mechanism.