Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
The HC permitted the petitioner to enter the port and take photographs and videos of the vessel, as previously directed by the Additional and District Sessions Judge and upheld by this Court. Despite the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier CRLMC, the Court allowed the petition due to the innocuous nature of the relief sought. The opposite party was ordered to comply with condition no. III of the prior order dated 12.02.2024, subject to the petitioner paying Rs.10,000/- to the Orissa High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund. Upon submission of the payment receipt, the petitioner was authorized to proceed with photography and videography on 30.04.2025. The receipt was to be scanned and included in the digital record. The petition was thus allowed with costs.
The HC permitted the petitioner to enter the port and take photographs and videos of the vessel, as previously directed by the Additional and District Sessions Judge and upheld by this Court. Despite the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier CRLMC, the Court allowed the petition due to the innocuous nature of the relief sought. The opposite party was ordered to comply with condition no. III of the prior order dated 12.02.2024, subject to the petitioner paying Rs.10,000/- to the Orissa High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund. Upon submission of the payment receipt, the petitioner was authorized to proceed with photography and videography on 30.04.2025. The receipt was to be scanned and included in the digital record. The petition was thus allowed with costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
