Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal regarding disallowance of short-term capital loss on share sale. The tribunal held that oral agreements between family members deserve equal credibility and mere deficiencies in ROC records cannot justify treating transactions as sham without additional evidence. The court emphasized that strong suspicion cannot substitute for evidence supporting the assessee's claim. The tribunal ruled that the onus lies on Revenue to prove apparent transactions are not genuine, rather than requiring taxpayers to prove legitimacy of properly documented share sales with consideration movement. The disallowance was reversed and capital loss claim was accepted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
