Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 and addition of bogus Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal held that Assessing Officer failed to apply independent mind while issuing reopening notice, merely relying on information from Director of Income Tax (Investigation) without forming requisite "reason to believe" that income escaped assessment. Regarding LTCG on penny stocks, ITAT found AO's reliance on SEBI report baseless as the report on JMD Telefilms did not implicate assessee, who held shares for over three years and sold during price decline period. SEBI never issued notice to assessee or broker regarding these transactions. Without specific evidence controverting documentary proof and absent any SEBI inquiry involving assessee, legitimate stock exchange transactions qualified for exemption under Section 10(38). Assessment additions deleted entirely.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 and addition of bogus Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal held that Assessing Officer failed to apply independent mind while issuing reopening notice, merely relying on information from Director of Income Tax (Investigation) without forming requisite "reason to believe" that income escaped assessment. Regarding LTCG on penny stocks, ITAT found AO's reliance on SEBI report baseless as the report on JMD Telefilms did not implicate assessee, who held shares for over three years and sold during price decline period. SEBI never issued notice to assessee or broker regarding these transactions. Without specific evidence controverting documentary proof and absent any SEBI inquiry involving assessee, legitimate stock exchange transactions qualified for exemption under Section 10(38). Assessment additions deleted entirely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.