Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal regarding jewellery seized during search operations. Revenue authorities added value of 690gms unexplained jewellery to assessee's income. CIT(A) granted partial relief allowing 1700gms under CBDT Circular 1916/1994 which permits retention of jewellery up to specified limits: 500gms for married women, 250gms for unmarried women, and 100gms for men, considering customary practices of gifting jewellery as Sthridhan. However, CIT(A) sustained addition for remaining 110gms as assessee failed to establish source despite opportunities. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order finding no error in applying circular provisions while maintaining addition for genuinely unexplained jewellery portion where assessee provided no supporting evidence.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
