Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging redetermination of value for imported metal scrap under Rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. The department relied on a Tribunal precedent from Commissioner of Customs, Patparganj vs. Hanuman Prasad & Sons case. However, Delhi HC recently overruled this Tribunal decision in Niraj Silk Mills case, ruling in favor of the importer after examining various Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments on identical valuation issues. CESTAT found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order rejecting value enhancement, upholding the importer's position on customs valuation determination.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
