Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal for statistical purposes regarding transfer pricing adjustments on management services fees and R&D expenses paid to associated enterprises. TPO made upward ALP adjustments citing inadequate documentation, confirmed by DRP. However, assessee subsequently filed additional evidence including service agreements and correspondence with AEs before DRP, which called for remand report from TPO/AO that was never furnished. ITAT noted TPO lacks jurisdiction under section 37 to examine expenditure allowability per CIT v. Lever India Exports Limited precedent. Since assessee provided prima facie evidence substantiating arm's length pricing but TPO failed to examine such evidence or compute adjustments per prescribed methodology, and no remand report was submitted despite DRP's direction, ITAT set aside TPO/AO and DRP orders. Matter remanded to TPO/AO for fresh computation in accordance with law, with assessee directed to provide requisite documentation.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal for statistical purposes regarding transfer pricing adjustments on management services fees and R&D expenses paid to associated enterprises. TPO made upward ALP adjustments citing inadequate documentation, confirmed by DRP. However, assessee subsequently filed additional evidence including service agreements and correspondence with AEs before DRP, which called for remand report from TPO/AO that was never furnished. ITAT noted TPO lacks jurisdiction under section 37 to examine expenditure allowability per CIT v. Lever India Exports Limited precedent. Since assessee provided prima facie evidence substantiating arm's length pricing but TPO failed to examine such evidence or compute adjustments per prescribed methodology, and no remand report was submitted despite DRP's direction, ITAT set aside TPO/AO and DRP orders. Matter remanded to TPO/AO for fresh computation in accordance with law, with assessee directed to provide requisite documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.