Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the addition made under section 69 read with section 115BBE for unexplained investment in partnership firm capital. The assessee successfully explained the immediate source as loan from father received through banking channels with complete fund trail. Father's source was substantiated through documented share sale on recognized stock exchange via registered broker. Revenue failed to produce independent material to discredit the explanation or establish undisclosed income. ITAT held both essential conditions under section 69 were unfulfilled as the assessee recorded the investment in books and satisfactorily explained nature and source through cogent documentary evidence. Assessing Officer could not rebut the explanation with credible material, and mere suspicion cannot substitute legally admissible evidence.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
