Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT quashed the impugned order dated 21.10.2024 for violating principles of natural justice under Section 99(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Resolution Professional failed to provide the mandatory seven-day notice period to the appellant for furnishing information, instead providing only two days. The tribunal held that once discretion under Section 99(4) is exercised, compliance with the seven-day requirement becomes mandatory. A subsequent reminder letter cannot cure the initial procedural defect, and substantial compliance doctrine is inapplicable where statutory timelines are explicitly prescribed. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority with directions to provide proper seven-day notice from receipt of certified copies. Appeal allowed by way of remand.
NCLAT quashed the impugned order dated 21.10.2024 for violating principles of natural justice under Section 99(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Resolution Professional failed to provide the mandatory seven-day notice period to the appellant for furnishing information, instead providing only two days. The tribunal held that once discretion under Section 99(4) is exercised, compliance with the seven-day requirement becomes mandatory. A subsequent reminder letter cannot cure the initial procedural defect, and substantial compliance doctrine is inapplicable where statutory timelines are explicitly prescribed. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority with directions to provide proper seven-day notice from receipt of certified copies. Appeal allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
