Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition challenging property attachment under PMLA. The court held that the petitioner lacks legal standing as a 'claimant' since the trade loss suffered does not constitute a quantifiable loss under Section 8 of PMLA. The Bulgarian court order cannot be executed in India due to absence of reciprocal treaty. The petitioner failed to demonstrate legitimate interest in the attached properties, and consequently, the restoration claim was rejected, upholding the Special Court's original order.
HC dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition challenging property attachment under PMLA. The court held that the petitioner lacks legal standing as a 'claimant' since the trade loss suffered does not constitute a quantifiable loss under Section 8 of PMLA. The Bulgarian court order cannot be executed in India due to absence of reciprocal treaty. The petitioner failed to demonstrate legitimate interest in the attached properties, and consequently, the restoration claim was rejected, upholding the Special Court's original order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.