Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT resolved multiple taxation issues in favor of the assessee. The tribunal deleted additions related to undisclosed turnover by recognizing discrepancies between GST and income tax records, specifically noting that capital asset sales are recorded differently in financial statements. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, the tribunal found the assessee discharged its evidentiary burden, with the revenue failing to substantiate contrary claims. The tribunal emphasized that additions based on conjecture cannot be sustained, particularly when loan repayments were demonstrated. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was comprehensively allowed, with additions under both disputed grounds being deleted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
