Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT adjudicated a customs valuation dispute concerning transportation charges for Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF). The Tribunal distinguished between ATF carried in aircraft fuel tanks for airline consumption and ATF imported as cargo. Applying precedent from a previous Larger Bench decision in Jet Airways, the Tribunal held that transportation costs for ATF within aircraft fuel tanks are not includable in the assessable value for customs duty calculation. The key differentiation hinged on whether ATF is a consumable for airline operations or a separately transported cargo. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, excluding transportation charges from the customs valuation for remnant ATF carried in aircraft tanks.
CESTAT adjudicated a customs valuation dispute concerning transportation charges for Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF). The Tribunal distinguished between ATF carried in aircraft fuel tanks for airline consumption and ATF imported as cargo. Applying precedent from a previous Larger Bench decision in Jet Airways, the Tribunal held that transportation costs for ATF within aircraft fuel tanks are not includable in the assessable value for customs duty calculation. The key differentiation hinged on whether ATF is a consumable for airline operations or a separately transported cargo. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, excluding transportation charges from the customs valuation for remnant ATF carried in aircraft tanks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.