Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT ruled that compensation expenses paid by the assessee to OXEECO were not directly connected to the share transfer to Harsco Investments Europe BV. The tribunal found the two transactions independent and unrelated, therefore rejecting the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 48. The compensation payment was deemed a separate transaction not incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the share transfer. Consequently, the grounds of appeal were dismissed, upholding the lower authorities' decision and denying the claimed deduction while computing long-term capital gains.