Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant's involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant's involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.