Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged clandestine removal of sponge iron, where revenue authorities relied primarily on unverified pendrive evidence without substantive corroborative documentation. The tribunal critically examined the evidentiary basis and found insufficient substantiation for the claims. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the confirmed demand of Rs.1,47,93,916/- along with associated interest and penalties. The key legal determination centered on the inadequacy of evidence, specifically highlighting the lack of comprehensive investigative procedures, absence of verifiable input-output analysis, and reliance on unattributed digital records. The appellate order comprehensively rejected the revenue's case due to evidentiary insufficiency and procedural non-compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
