Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT adjudicated a dispute involving sections 50C, 56(2)(vii), and 69B regarding property valuation and tax assessment. The tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) incorrectly applied section 69B instead of invoking exceptions under sections 50C and 56(2)(vii). The AO improperly relied on the Stamp Duty Valuation Authority's valuation without considering the actual consideration agreed in the purchase agreement. The tribunal held that the Assessee discharged its burden of proof and demonstrated the legitimacy of the property transaction. Regarding section 35AC, the tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for verification of donation-related documents and potential deduction allowance, directing a comprehensive review of submitted receipts and notifications.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
