Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT resolved a tax dispute involving a UK-based engineering consultancy firm's income from services rendered in India. The Tribunal determined that payments received for consulting engineering services constitute business income under Article 7 of India-UK DTAA, not Fees for Technical Services (FTS). Since the company lacked a Permanent Establishment in India, the income was deemed non-taxable in India. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's position, consistent with its prior decisions in similar cases, and allowed the appeal, effectively exempting the income from Indian taxation.
ITAT resolved a tax dispute involving a UK-based engineering consultancy firm's income from services rendered in India. The Tribunal determined that payments received for consulting engineering services constitute business income under Article 7 of India-UK DTAA, not Fees for Technical Services (FTS). Since the company lacked a Permanent Establishment in India, the income was deemed non-taxable in India. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's position, consistent with its prior decisions in similar cases, and allowed the appeal, effectively exempting the income from Indian taxation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.