Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
CESTAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving Cenvat Credit claims on mutual fund transactions. The tribunal held that investment in mutual fund units does not constitute a service under section 65B(44), thus invalidating the tax demand. The court found no trading of securities and rejected the revenue's contention that the appellant provided exempted services. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, dismissed the revenue's appeal, and allowed the appellant's appeals (ST/30046/2021, ST/30344/2020, and ST/31076/2019). The penalty under section 78 was also set aside, as the appellant had already paid the entire amount with interest before the show cause notice was issued.
CESTAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving Cenvat Credit claims on mutual fund transactions. The tribunal held that investment in mutual fund units does not constitute a service under section 65B(44), thus invalidating the tax demand. The court found no trading of securities and rejected the revenue's contention that the appellant provided exempted services. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, dismissed the revenue's appeal, and allowed the appellant's appeals (ST/30046/2021, ST/30344/2020, and ST/31076/2019). The penalty under section 78 was also set aside, as the appellant had already paid the entire amount with interest before the show cause notice was issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
