Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
CESTAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving Cenvat Credit claims on mutual fund transactions. The tribunal held that investment in mutual fund units does not constitute a service under section 65B(44), thus invalidating the tax demand. The court found no trading of securities and rejected the revenue's contention that the appellant provided exempted services. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, dismissed the revenue's appeal, and allowed the appellant's appeals (ST/30046/2021, ST/30344/2020, and ST/31076/2019). The penalty under section 78 was also set aside, as the appellant had already paid the entire amount with interest before the show cause notice was issued.