Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
HC finds no jurisdictional error in the tax authority's invocation of extended limitation period. The petitioner, who surrendered service tax registration, failed to disclose transactions in ST-3 and did not cooperate during investigation. The court prima facie determines that the taxing authority's view of suppression is justified, as critical facts emerged only through investigation. The demand-cum-show cause notice and subsequent order remain valid, with no interference warranted on jurisdictional grounds. Application disposed of accordingly.
HC finds no jurisdictional error in the tax authority's invocation of extended limitation period. The petitioner, who surrendered service tax registration, failed to disclose transactions in ST-3 and did not cooperate during investigation. The court prima facie determines that the taxing authority's view of suppression is justified, as critical facts emerged only through investigation. The demand-cum-show cause notice and subsequent order remain valid, with no interference warranted on jurisdictional grounds. Application disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.