Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC finds no jurisdictional error in the tax authority's invocation of extended limitation period. The petitioner, who surrendered service tax registration, failed to disclose transactions in ST-3 and did not cooperate during investigation. The court prima facie determines that the taxing authority's view of suppression is justified, as critical facts emerged only through investigation. The demand-cum-show cause notice and subsequent order remain valid, with no interference warranted on jurisdictional grounds. Application disposed of accordingly.
HC finds no jurisdictional error in the tax authority's invocation of extended limitation period. The petitioner, who surrendered service tax registration, failed to disclose transactions in ST-3 and did not cooperate during investigation. The court prima facie determines that the taxing authority's view of suppression is justified, as critical facts emerged only through investigation. The demand-cum-show cause notice and subsequent order remain valid, with no interference warranted on jurisdictional grounds. Application disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
